Full review
Who it works for
A salaried 28–40 year old whose §80C bucket is not yet saturated by EPF and home-loan principal, who wants the simplest possible LIC contract — pay every year, get a lump sum at the end, no riders, no income streams, no post-maturity tail. The improved 2024 surrender mechanics (post one full premium year, SSV benchmarked to G-Sec + 50 bps) make it slightly more forgiving than the older Plan 914 if life intervenes.
Who it doesn't work for
Anyone whose dominant need is life cover — a term plan delivers 10–20× the cover at the same premium. Anyone who can hold an equity SIP for 15+ years — historic equity returns have beaten endowment XIRR by 3–6 percentage points after tax. Anyone who needs liquidity flexibility — the policy loan is available but capped, and surrender values stay below cumulative premiums for at least the first 5–7 years.
What can go wrong
LIC may declare lower SRB in future years (the 2025 valuation already shows compression versus 2023). You may lapse in years 1–2 and lose 100% of premiums. You may surrender mid-term and recover 30–60% depending on year. The structural risk is buying a 20-year commitment with a 5-year horizon — do not let the agent talk you into a longer term than you genuinely intend to hold.
What we'd compute differently
Our headline XIRR uses the middle premium-paying term (15 years against a 21-year policy term),
excludes optional rider premiums from the cash-flow base, and assumes the latest declared
simple reversionary bonus rate holds for the full term. Try other PPTs and bonus assumptions
on the New Endowment calculator.